2026 Primary Election Results
Primaries overestimated El-Sayed’s margin in his primary by approximately twelve points. This is considered typical for primary elections for U.S. Senate and governor, where the typical aggregate poll is off by around 13 percentage points because voting patterns become much less consistent.
Per the New York Times:
Conducting surveys in partisan primaries has long presented a challenge to pollsters, as it requires them to make assumptions about who will actually turn out to vote. Without mandatory party registration in Michigan, pollsters must guess who will show up on Election Day.
Many surveys assumed political independents would make up 30 to 40 percent of the electorate. These polls showed Dr. El-Sayed winning independents by a wide margin. While there is little authoritative detail available on the actual electorate, that assumption could have contributed to the challenge in polling the race, as voters who decline to identify with a political party tend to vote less frequently.
…
Polls did seem to understand the underlying dynamics of the race. In pre-election polls, Dr. El-Sayed did particularly well with younger voters; on election night, he performed particularly well in areas with a high concentration of young voters. Polls also accurately captured Ms. Stevens’s strength with Black voters and in suburban communities.
Even though the margins for voter turnout were off, data analyzing popularity among specific demographics was accurate. The 2026 Democratic primary midterms show that polling predictions on El-Sayed and Rogers' strength with voters in various communities (those with a high concentration of young voters, black voters, or other demographics) will be a fairly accurate predictor of the real election. This general accuracy suggests that, by separating data specifically by age (as this poll does), we can predict different possible outcomes based on age-based turnout.